The report

More than a conclusion. A medical opinion that shows the reasoning.

A Nexus Comprehensive Medical Opinion Report brings the medical record, chronology, relevant literature, competing evidence, and condition-specific analysis together so the physician's opinion can be followed from evidence to conclusion.

N
Nexus Medical OpinionsPhysician-reviewed work product

GENERALIZED STRUCTURAL PREVIEW

Comprehensive Medical Opinion Report

Case identificationFictionalizedMedical frameworkQuestion-specific
01   Records Reviewed
02   Medical Question
03   Evidence Review
04   Medical Literature
05   Medical Analysis
06   Medical Opinion
ReferencesPhysician certification
PHYSICIAN
REVIEWED

Not a template letter

The opinion should explain why.

A short nexus letter may state a diagnosis, summarize a few records, and provide a favorable or unfavorable conclusion. Complex VA medical questions often require more.

Nexus is designed around a comprehensive report that shows what was reviewed, identifies the medical question, addresses relevant evidence, considers competing explanations, incorporates appropriate medical literature, and explains the reasoning behind the physician's opinion.

Short-form opinion may include
  • Diagnosis
  • Limited record summary
  • Medical conclusion
  • Brief rationale
Nexus comprehensive report is designed to include
  • Defined medical questions
  • Broader record review
  • Medical chronology
  • Favorable and unfavorable evidence
  • Relevant literature
  • Competing explanations
  • Condition-specific analysis
  • Physician medical opinions
  • References
Evidence indexMaterials reviewed
01Service treatment records02Personnel records03VA treatment records04Private treatment records05C&P examinations06Imaging07Diagnostic testing
Clinical sourcesEvaluation + treatment
Case contextDecisions + lay evidence

The foundation

The opinion starts with the record.

The report identifies the materials reviewed so the reader can understand the evidentiary basis of the analysis. Potential sources may include service, treatment, examination, imaging, testing, medication, opinion, lay, and relevant case materials.

Listing a record does not mean every document supports the requested conclusion. The purpose is to establish what evidence was actually considered.

Define the question

A strong opinion answers a specific medical question.

Each issue should identify the medical relationship being evaluated.

01Direct

Is the current condition medically related to military service?

02Secondary

Did a service-connected condition cause another medical condition?

03Aggravation

Did a service-connected condition increase the severity of another condition beyond its expected course?

04Multifactorial

How should competing risk factors, chronology, medications, other conditions, and alternative explanations be evaluated?

Put the record in time

Chronology can change the medical analysis.

The timing of symptoms, diagnoses, injuries, treatment, medication changes, imaging findings, exposures, and other medical events may be central to determining whether a proposed relationship is medically supportable.

Medical chronologyEvents organized in sequence
  1. 01Service
  2. 02Reported symptoms
  3. 03Medical evaluation
  4. 04Diagnosis
  5. 05Treatment
  6. 06Later examination

Sequence informs context. It does not determine the conclusion by itself.

Favorable and unfavorable evidence

A credible medical opinion has to address more than the evidence supporting one answer.

The report should consider evidence supporting the proposed relationship as well as conflicting histories, unfavorable examinations, competing risk factors, alternative causes, gaps in chronology, and limitations in the available record.

Evidence supporting the relationshipRelevant history + medical findings
Evidence requiring explanationCompeting factors + record limitations

The goal is not to force the evidence toward a predetermined result. The goal is to explain what the medical record can support.

Research in context

Medical literature can support the reasoning without replacing the individual record.

Relevant peer-reviewed research may help explain disease mechanisms, risk factors, medication effects, occupational exposures, secondary relationships, or competing medical explanations.

Population-level evidence does not automatically establish causation in an individual veteran. The literature has to be applied in the context of that veteran's own medical history.

01Generic source typePeer-reviewed cohort
02Generic source typeSystematic review
03Generic source typeClinical review
04Generic source typeMedical guideline
Applied in contextIndividual medical record

The Nexus approach

Separate medical questions can still belong to one medical history.

A veteran may have several conditions involving overlapping symptoms, medications, risk factors, service history, and medical evidence. Reviewing those relationships together can provide context that is lost when each issue is treated as an isolated template.

01Service history
02Medical records
03Diagnoses
04Medication
05Lay evidence
06Medical literature
07Competing evidence
08Multiple medical questions
Integrated medical analysisRelationships considered together
Physician medical opinions

Each question stands on its own

Integrated does not mean every condition gets the same answer.

Each medical question is evaluated independently. The evidence may support one relationship, fail to support another, or be insufficient to reach a reliable conclusion.

A comprehensive report can still reach different conclusions for different conditions because each opinion must reflect the evidence relevant to that specific medical question.

01
Medical question AIndependent evidence review

Conclusion determined by the record

02
Medical question BIndependent evidence review

Conclusion determined by the record

03
Medical question CIndependent evidence review

Conclusion determined by the record

N
Condition-specific sectionEvidence to medical opinion
01
Medical questionThe relationship being evaluated
02
EvidenceRecord findings considered on both sides
03
AnalysisChronology, literature, and alternatives
04
Medical opinionPhysician conclusion area

The conclusion

The opinion comes after the analysis.

The report clearly states the physician's medical conclusion for each question. The reader can see the question, the evidence considered, and the reasoning that precedes the opinion.

Independent medical judgment

The physician determines the final medical opinion.

The physician reviews the relevant medical evidence, analysis, and proposed opinions and determines whether to adopt, revise, or decline the conclusions based on independent medical judgment.

The final report must reflect the physician's own medical opinion.
N
Physician reviewIndependent determination
01AdoptSupported by medical judgment
02ReviseReasoning or conclusion changed
03DeclineNot medically supportable

Report structure

Built so the reasoning can be followed.

  1. 01Case identification
  2. 02Records reviewed
  3. 03Scope and medical framework
  4. 04Medical question
  5. 05Relevant medical history and chronology
  6. 06Lay evidence when relevant
  7. 07Favorable and adverse evidence
  8. 08Relevant medical literature
  9. 09Competing medical explanations
  10. 10Condition-specific medical analysis
  11. 11Physician medical opinion
  12. 12References
  13. 13Physician certification and signature

Report structure may vary depending on the medical questions and evidence in the case.

NComprehensive Medical Opinion Report

GENERALIZED CONTENTS PREVIEW

Report structure

01Case identification
02Records reviewed
03Scope and medical framework
04Medical question
05Relevant medical history and chronology
06Lay evidence when relevant
07Favorable and adverse evidence
08Relevant medical literature

De-Identified Sample

Review an actual Nexus report.

This de-identified sample is based on a completed Nexus medical opinion report. Identifying information and physician signature details have been removed for privacy. It shows how the medical evidence, relevant literature, competing considerations, condition-specific analysis, evidentiary context, and physician certification are presented in the completed work product.

Report pricing

One comprehensive report. Up to five medical issues.

$1,200

Additional medical issues: $150 each after five.

Start Your Medical Review

Start with the medical evidence

Build the opinion from the record, not from a template.

Start your medical review or request a sample report to see how Nexus approaches complex VA medical questions.

Start Your Medical ReviewRequest a Sample Report